USPTO serial 77172579
DEVELI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEVELI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried, cooked and frozen meat; preserved seafood; dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; eggs; edible oils and fats; cooked and preserved prepackaged dinner dishes mainly consisting of meat, fish and vegetables; soups; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; processed preserved beans, peas, soy beans, lentils and chickpeas; preserved olives and pickles; potato chips; potato crisps; potato fritters; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; butter; margarine, cheese, yogurt, drinks made of yogurt and water; and milk cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; cocoa; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; beverages based on coffee and cocoa; drinks made with cocoa extract, macaroni; vermicelli; flour; bread; pizzas; waffles; pancakes; biscuits; wafers; cakes; sweets being candies; pastries; confectionery, namely, candies; desserts made of flour; honey, royal jelly for food purposes; food flavorings other than essential oils; aromatic preparations for foods, namely, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler; chocolate-coated nuts and candy-coated nuts; vanilla; baking powder; yeast; flour; processed semolina; sugar; tea made of plant leaves; iced tea; lime tea; candies; Turkish delight, also known as lokum; halvah; chocolates; chocolate products, namely, candy; chocolate and confectionery formed as ornaments for Christmas trees; chocolate-based food beverages not being dairy based or vegetable based; chewing gums; edible ice; ice cream; salt; rice; boiled and ground wheat, snacks and crisps made of flour and cereals; corn flakes; oat flakes; and breakfast cereals | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers; alcoholic and non-alcoholic beers; beer yeast; aerated water; spring water; table water; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, carbonated soft drinks; fruit juices; vegetable juices; concentrated vegetable and fruit juices; carbonated drinks; tomato juice; isotonic beverages; boza, namely, a traditional Turkish fermented millet drink; turnip juice; and unfermented grape juice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Develier, Arif
- Other trademarks owned by Develier, Arif
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named DEVELI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |