USPTO serial 77184218
EZ GLIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZ GLIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C Gilmore
Richard C Gilmore MASCHOFF BRENNAN LAYCOCK GILMORE ISRAELSEN & WRIGH111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices, namely, aortic and/or arterial perfusion cannulae for cardiac procedures, excluding guidewires | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |