USPTO serial 77194524
NUSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)
JAMES M. SLATTERY (REG. NO. 28,380) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; beverages made of tea; cocoa; chocolate; cocoa beverages with milk; chocolate food beverages, not being diary based; ice cream; salt; soy sauce; cooking and flavoring sauce; black and dark vinegar; vinegar; seasonings, spices and flavorings for food; sugar; natural sweeteners; honey; royal jelly for food purposes; molasses and maple syrups; chewing gum; candy mints, non-medicated lozenges and candy; rice crackers; snack mixes consisting of crackers, pretzels,candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; biscuits; cakes; breads; sandwiches; puddings; pies; dumplings; buns; spring rolls; egg rolls, egg dumplings; rice; processed wheat; rolled oats; flour; processed grains; pearl-like balls consisting of food starches made from cassava, tapioca, taro and/or sweet potatoes; sago, tapioca, pearl tapioca; glutinous rice; packaged meals consisting of rice; instant noodles; packaged meals consisting of noodles or pastas; dumplings; noodles; rice noodles; spring roll skins and flavored vinegar | ACTIVE | Feb 23, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |