USPTO serial 77196806
SUGAR FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGAR FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex R. Sluzas
ALEX R. SLUZAS PAUL AND PAUL2 THOUSAND MARKET ST STE 2900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING; NAMELY, SKIRTS, SKORTS, DRESSES, SHORTS, SUITS, PANT SUITS, DRESS SUITS, CAMISOLES, BLOUSES, SLEEVELESS BLOUSES, CAP-SLEEVE BLOUSES, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, HALTER TOPS, TUBE TOPS, TUBE DRESSES, BELTS, PANTS, JEANS, KNICKERS, CAPRI PANTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SWEAT SHORTS, SWEAT SKIRTS, SWEAT DRESSES, JUMPSUITS, CATSUITS, OVERALL-STYLE PANTS, OVERALL-SYTLE DRESSES, OVERALL-STYLE SKIRTS, OVERALL-STYLE SHORTS, ONE-PIECE SHORT SETS, SOCKS, EVENING GOWNS, COCKTAIL DRESSES, SLEEPWEAR, PAJAMA PANTS, PAJAMA SHIRTS, BUTTON-DOWN SLEEP SHIRTS, T-SHIRT SLEEP SHIRTS, TANK TOP SLEEP SHORTS, WOMEN'S BOXER SHORTS, NIGHTGOWNS, TEDDY-GOWNS, BRAS, PANTIES, THONGS, G-STRING THONGS, BOY SHORTS, GARTERS, CORSETS, BUSTIERS, ROBES, HATS, SCARVES, GLOVES WIH FINGER COVERAGE, GLOVES WITHOUT FINGER COVERAGE, MITTENS, LEGWARMERS, LONG-JOHNS (THERMALS), COATS, JACKETS, LONG COATS, SHORT COATS, MID-LENGTH COATS, SNEAKERS, SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS, PUMPS, STILLETTOS, PEEP TOE PUMPS, WEDGE HEEL SHOES, WEDGE HEEL SANDALS, FLIP-FLOPS, THONG STYLE FLIP-FLOPS, SLIDE-ONS, OUTERWEAR, PURSES, HANDBAGS | ACTIVE | Jul 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |