Drawing for KLICK SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 77197498

KLICK SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KLICK SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah J. Peckham

DEBORAH J. PECKHAM KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP1 LINCOLN STBOSTON, MA 02111-2901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; consultancy in the field of software designACTIVEMay 24, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 13, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 13, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 10, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 21, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Apr 21, 2009GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Apr 21, 2009CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Apr 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 6, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 6, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 4, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 4, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance