Drawing for FIGHTNET

USPTO serial 77197839

FIGHTNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIGHTNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas N. Masters

DOUGLAS N. MASTERS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK ST STE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60610-4746UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Subscription television broadcasting services; video on demand transmission services; cable television broadcasting servicesACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, personalized and interactive entertainment services in the nature of providing personalized television programming, and interactive cable and digital television programmingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 14, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 8, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 13, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 13, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance