USPTO serial 77199322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ried im Innkreis, AT
Ried im Innkreis, AT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LOWRIE, LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP1 MAIN STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142-1531UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and non-hand-operated apparatus, namely, apparatus for foaming glass, mixing apparatuses, namely, stirrers, agitators and blenders for mixing building materials, namely, components of cellular glass, blenders, casting machines, conveyors, apparatus for annealing building material made of cellular glass or foam glass comprising conveyors through furnaces and cooling apparatus; cutting apparatuses, namely, namely, die-cutting machines, molding presses, scoring machines, water-jet cutting machines, milling machines; parts and tools for the aforementioned machines for the treatment of building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls, and their components; power saws, grinding machines for cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls; apparatus and their components for continuous glass foaming and cooling of the foamed glass to a sheet or block in an in-line installation; and machine tools for mixing, blending, casting, forming, foaming, heating, cooling, cutting, grinding, and polishing of building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand operated apparatus, namely, hand-operated devices for mixing components of cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls, blenders, devices for casting of building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls; hand saws, grinding devices, namely, manually operated grinding stones, manually operated grinding wheels, and grindstones for grinding building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets and cellular glass walls; hand-operated cutting devices, namely, glass cutters and knives and other hand-operated cutting tools for cutting building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls and their components; polishing devices, namely, hand-operated polishing tools to polish building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls and their components; and hand-tools for mixing, blending, foaming, cutting, grinding, polishing, casting, and forming of building materials, namely, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Heating installation, air-regulation and control apparatuses, namely, fans, apparatuses for air piping, namely, pipes, channels, ventilators, fan blowers, suction pipes, central air-conditioning installations for industrial purposes, air-conditioning, air ventilation apparatus and instruments, air cleaning units; air-blowing devices, namely, apparatus and instruments for ventilating, direct vents for gas appliances, electric fans, electric heating fans, oven ventilator, hoods, ventilating exhaust fans, ventilating fans for commercial and industrial use, ventilating louvers, and ventilation hoods for stoves; ovens and furnaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, foam glass, foam glass chippings, foam glass sheets, foam glass walls, cellular glass, cellular glass chippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls, composite materials, namely, blocks, bricks, posts, slabs and panels made from foam glass, cellular glass, cellular glass clippings, cellular glass sheets, cellular glass walls and glass | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |