Drawing for JUGGLE

USPTO serial 77203667

JUGGLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUGGLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Mikulina

Jennifer M. Mikulina McDermott Will & Emery LLP227 W. Monroe StreetSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606-5096

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising for others via the InternetACTIVE
038Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of information by electronic communications networks; telecommunications services, namely, telecommunications access services; data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means, electronic exchange of voice, data, and graphics accessible via computer and telecommunication networks; providing multiple user access to global computer information network; Internet cafè services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the Internet in a cafè environment; providing online bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest, transmission of information by electronic communication networks, namely, transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest, electronic mail services; instant messaging services, voice over ip services; communications by computer terminals; wireless broadband communication services; mobile phone communication servicesACTIVE
042Computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user-defined information, personal profiles and information, providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in managing and maintaining information and files over computer networks, intranets and the Internet, providing online non-downloadable software for creating and maintaining websites and blogs; providing online non-downloadable software for file collaboration and revision tracking, providing online non-downloadable software for granting and controlling access to files, providing online non-downloadable software for managing individual and group calendars and schedules; providing online non-downloadable software featuring online storage of documents and databases, providing online computer mapping services, mapping services, namely, providing a website and website links to geographic information, map images, and trip routing; providing online non-downloadable software for tracking, managing, and optimizing advertising and promotional campaigns, and calculating return on investment in connection with the same; providing online non-downloadable software for tracking website traffic, e-commerce activity, customer loyalty, and sales conversion rates, providing online non-downloadable software for optimizing website navigation, providing online non-downloadable software for managing, collecting, monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links, Design and development services for others of software for managing, collecting monitoring and analyzing web, blog and other online site traffic, user preferences and links; technical support and computer consulting services related to all of the foregoing; computer consultation servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 20, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 13, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 21, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 12, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance