USPTO serial 77203696
MARTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3597105Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
Yorba Linda, CA
Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
Yorba Linda, CA
Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
Yorba Linda, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Justin Lum
A. JUSTIN LUM LAW OFFICES OF A. JUSTIN LUM1005 E COLORADO BLVD STE 207PASADENA, CA 91106-2342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Dictation equipment, namely, tape recorders, digital voice recorders, tape transcribers, digital voice transcribers, microphones, tape and digital audio mixers, tape duplicators, blank audio tapes; digital video recorders, loudspeakers, automatic phonograph record players | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1962 |
| 035 | Retail store and online retail store for dictation equipment, namely, tape recorders, digital voice recorders, tape transcribers, digital voice transcribers, microphones, tape and digital audio mixers, tape duplicators, blank audio tapes; digital video recorders, loudspeakers, automatic phonograph record players, mobile video recording systems for automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1962 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Martel Electronics Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MARTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |