USPTO serial 77208576
RAPID RELEASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAPID RELEASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BLOOMINGTON, IN
Bloomington, IN
Bloomington, IN
Bloomington, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Meyer
Charles J. Meyer Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP111 MONUMENT CIRCLE, SUITE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Accelerated publication of printed matter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTHOR SOLUTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Author Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Author Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Author Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named RAPID RELEASE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Feb 12, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Feb 17, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Feb 17, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Feb 11, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Nov 16, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Oct 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |