USPTO serial 77210417
KASON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KASON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric R. Moran
Eric R. Moran McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP300 South Wacker Drive31st FloorChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vibratory screeners for sifting, scalping, classifying, delumping, and dewatering of bulk solids and slurries and separating bulk solid materials from solids and slurries using multi-plane, inertial vibration that causes particles to pass through apertures in the screen or to travel across the screen surface in controlled pathways; Combination vibratory screener, a batch hopper and an integral feed control device regulating the flow of material into the screener for a screening in batches; Batch and continuous single-deck screeners separating solid particles from dry or moist bulk solid material or solids-laden slurries for industrial, food, dairy and pharmaceutical industries; Low profile, high-capacity scalper separating machine; Batch and continuous single and multi-deck vibratory screeners sifting, scalping and/or classifying dry, moist, lumpy, stringy and otherwise difficult-to-handle bulk material into precise segment particle classifications; Batch and continuous single and multi-deck vibratory screeners with anti-blinding devices for sifting, scalping and/or classifying dry, moist, lumpy, stringy and otherwise difficult-to-handle bulk material into precise segment particle classifications; Batch and continuous single and multi-deck vibratory screeners with hinged lid and/or frames released via quick-disconnect clamps and held in an open position by gas pistons, allowing rapid screen changes, inspection and easy, thorough wash down of all interior surfaces, for sifting, scalping and/or classifying dry, moist, lumpy, stringy and otherwise difficult-to-handle bulk material into precise segment particle classifications; Quick Screen Change System for access to the interior of any circular vibratory screener for screen changing, cleaning or inspection; Ultra-Sanitary Screener with gap-free screen frames, quick-release "U" clamps, radius corners, a domed lid, and a lift device to raise the frames, continuous ground and polished welds, a crevice-free interior, and a washable underside Pharmaceutical/Sanitary CIP Sifter; Low-profile, ultra-sanitary batch sifters scalping oversize particles down to 38 microns (400 mesh) from bulk materials; High-capacity classifiers with a coarse upper screen to scalp and a fine-mesh lower screen to dedust for removing oversize particles and fines from plastic pellets, grains, sugar, salt, fertilizer and other materials at ultra-high rates; Internal recycle screening decks for cascading excess material over the periphery of the upper screen into a bowl shaped tray that redirects it into the center of the lower screen for final separation; High-capacity screener scalping dry materials in-line with dilute-phase pneumatic conveying systems at high rates, removing oversize particles and foreign materials from plastic resin, flour, starch, sugar, and numerous food and chemical products, primarily for loading/unloading of trucks or rail cars, or conveying materials between process or storage areas; Dual-screen ultra-high-capacity separator scalps in-line with pneumatic conveying systems gently, at ultra-high rates; Portable batch sifter scalps oversize particles from small batches of bulk material loaded into containers, process equipment and storage vessels; Mobile batch sifter scalps oversize particles from small batches of bulk material loaded into containers, process equipment and storage vessels; Wiper blade assembly mounted on separators and screener for breaking down lumps and preventing screen blinding; Ultrasonic anti-blinding device allowing clog-free, fine-mesh sifting of powders at high rates with no screen blinding; Circular vibratory bag dump screeners scalping bag scraps and other oversize materials from manually dumped bulk materials and protecting the operator and plant environment against dust contamination; Powder coater for coating sticky pellets with non-reactive powder for storage and shipping; Screens for circular vibratory screeners Centrifugal screeners for sifting, scalping, delumping and dewatering of bulk solids and slurries and for screening a wide variety of powders or granular materials, including chemicals, plastics and resins, foods, dairy products, pharmaceuticals and biologicals; Centrifugal screener separating solids from solids or slurries at high rates; Centrifugal screener with anti-blinding devices for separating solids from solids or slurries at high rates; Quick-clean centrifugal screener having a three-bearing shaft that cantilevers on the inboard bearing when the hinged end cover is opened and allowing rapid removal of components for thorough cleaning and maintenance for food, dairy, pharmaceutical and other contamination-sensitive materials; Centrifugal screener, for food, dairy, pharmaceutical and chemical applications requiring thorough wash down, frequent screen changes or runs of multiple materials, with a three-bearing shaft that cantilevers on the inboard bearing when the hinged end cover is open, allowing rapid, tool-free removal of the internals for wash down and screen changes; Centrifugal separator de-lumps and screens materials in-line with dilute-phase pneumatic conveying systems; Centrifugal screeners with an integral bag dump station and dust collector for removing bag scraps and other oversize contaminants from manually dumped bulk materials and protecting the operator and plant environment against dust contamination; Centrifugal dewatering screener for extracting moisture; Miniature centrifugal screener scalping, dedusting, delumping and dewatering small batches of pharmaceutical powders, powder coatings, bulk foods, and other contamination-sensitive products; Fluid bed dryers, coolers and moisturizers for drying, cooling or moisturing of bulk materials; Circular vibratory fluid bed processor for drying, cooling and moisturizing; High temperature fluid bed batch dryer for drying small batches of bulk materials; Circular fluid bed processors drying, cooling or moisturizing bulk foods, pharmaceuticals and chemicals in batch sizes typical of lab and pilot plant applications; Medium capacity fluid bed processing system for drying, cooling or moisturizing bulk material on a batch or continuous basis; Double-deck, circular vibratory fluid bed processor for drying, cooling and moisturizing; Static scalping sieve scalping coarse, free-flowing dry solids at ultra-high rates and continuously removing oversize particles from coarse, free-flowing, dry bulk solids; Static dewatering sieve continuously clarifying high volumes of wastewater and removing solids from waste streams at ultra-high rates; Static dewatering sieve for removing solids from waste streams at ultra-high rates and for clarifying high volumes of industrial or municipal wastewater | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 1966 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |