Drawing for BLACK SHEEP

USPTO serial 77210499

BLACK SHEEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK SHEEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Christopher Harris

J. Christopher Harris Hatfield Harris, PLLC5208 Village ParkwaySuite 9Rogers, AR 72758

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Conditioners; Hair bleaches; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair decolorants; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair lighteners; Hair lotions; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair relaxers; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair spray; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling spray; Hair tonicsACTIVE—
009Electric hair crimper; Electric hair curlers; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair rollers; Electric hair straightener; Electric hair straightening irons; Electric hair-curlers; Electric hand-held hair styling irons; Electric irons for styling hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 24, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance