USPTO serial 77213707
COTTON FARM MADE IN LOS ANGELES 100% PREMIUM COTTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COTTON FARM MADE IN LOS ANGELES 100% PREMIUM COTTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peyman Dadmehr
PEYMAN DADMEHR DANESH & DADMEHR, LLPSTE 40010866 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing made with 100% cotton, namely, belts, blazers, blouses, coats, dresses, footwear, halter tops, hats, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jumpers, jumpsuits, overalls, pullovers, shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, sport coats, sweatshirts, T-shirts, tank tops, Coats of denim, Denim jackets, Denims, Jeans, Bermuda shorts, Short petticoats, Short trousers, Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts, Shorts, Sports shirts with short sleeves, Capri pants, Pants, Skirt suits, Skirts, Skirts and dresses, Bathing suits, Dress suits, Ladies' suits, Men's suits, Shirts for suits, Suit coats, Suits, Coats for men and women, Over coats, Rain coats, Pullovers, Camisoles, Chemises, Dress shirts, Dresses, Halter tops, Knit shirts, Long sleeved vests, Vests, Tunics, Tank tops, Tops, Overalls, Polo shirts, Sweaters, Men and women jackets, vests, Rain trousers, Trousers, Evening dresses, Evening gowns, Gowns, Shrugs, Bottoms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |