USPTO serial 77216575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Augustine, FL
St. Augustine, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alejandro J. Fernandez
Alejandro J. Fernandez Broad and CasselSuite 3500 100 North Tampa StreetTampa, FL 33602UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit preserves; Fruit-based spreads; Jams; Canola oil; Cooking oil; Olive oil; Peanut oil; Pickles; Salad oil; Sesame oil; Soy bean oil; Vegetable oils; Nut butters; Peanut butter; Soup mixes; Soups; Canned or bottled vegetables; Potato chips; Potato crisps | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Ketchup; Mustard; Vinegar; Wine vinegar; Breakfast cereals; Cereal based snack food; Cookies; Corn chips; Crackers; Pita chips; Pretzels; Puffed corn snacks; Rice crackers; Tortilla chips; Cube sugar; Dried pasta; Flavoring syrup; Fresh pasta; Honey; Maple syrup; Molasses syrup; Natural sweetener; Pancake syrup; Pasta; Pizza sauce; Ready-made sauces; Spaghetti sauce; Sugar | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Fresh beans; Raw beans; Unprocessed beans | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Apple juice beverages; Frozen fruit beverages; Frozen fruit-based beverages; Fruit beverages; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit juices; Grape juice beverages; Orange juice beverages; Pineapple juice beverages | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |