USPTO serial 77221616
NEUROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEUROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl H. Pierce, Esq.
CARL H. PIERCE, ESQ. REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 7990PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101-7990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL SYSTEMS, NAMELY AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES IN THE NATURE OF SURGICAL EQUIPMENT INCORPORATING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND TISSUE IMAGING DEVICES INTEGRATED WITH INSTRUMENT MOTION ACTUATORS AND POSITION CONTROLLERS AND OPERATOR INTERFACE COMPONENTS INCLUDING OPERATOR INPUT DEVICES AND OPERATOR FEEDBACK DEVICES INCLUDING OPERATOR DISPLAYS, AND SURGICAL EQUIPMENT UTILIZING SUCH AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS ADAPTED FOR USE WITH SUCH AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES; MEDICAL DEVICES FOR PERFORMING MICROSURGERY, NAMELY MACHINERY FOR CONTROLLING THE MOTION OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SUCH MACHINERY; MEDICAL TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH SURGICAL PROCEDURES PERFORMED UTILIZING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY EQUIPMENT FOR ACCURATELY LOCATING AND POSITIONING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES WITH RESPECT TO A SURGICAL FIELD; AUGMENTED SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR ASSISTING IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SURGICAL PROCEDURES, NAMELY OPERATOR INTERFACES INCLUDING OPERATOR INPUT DEVICES AND OPERATOR DISPLAYS TO ALLOW AN OPERATOR OF AN AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE FOR CONTROLLING THE PHYSICAL POSITIONING OF SURGICAL EQUIPMENT IN A SURGICAL FIELD, AUGMENTED SURGICAL EQUIPMENT FOR CONTROLLING THE POSITION OF AND MOVING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AUGMENTED SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING TRAINING AND SIMULATION CAPABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO SURGICAL PROCEDURES USING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY, AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE EQUIPMENT HAVING INTERNAL CAPABILITIES FOR GENERATING FEEDBACK TO AN OPERATOR SIMULATING THE DISPLAYS AND CONTROL FEEDBACKS WHICH WOULD BE ENCOUNTERED DURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF A SURGICAL PROCEDURE USING THE AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE; AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |