USPTO serial 77228900
PURUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PURUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Tarolli
James L. Tarolli Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino, LLP1300 E 9th StreetSuite 1700Cleveland, OH 44114-1504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Water and discharge conduits, water and exit pipes and structural parts thereto, pipe clips and clamps and clips and clamps for water and discharge conduits as well as water and exit pipes for sanitary installations, waterseals, insert rings for mounting of waterseal inserts in floor drains and scuppers, extension rings and wire rope fittings of metal, namely, sockets, for floor drains and scuppers, gratings and covers for floor drains and scuppers, mounting plates for floor drains and scuppers, drain pipes, namely, drainage gullies and discharge chutes and grates therefor, oil guards, namely, metal guard barriers for keeping oil from entering drains, metal conduits, namely, wash chutes and gullies, all of the preceding goods made of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Plumbing fittings, namely, drains, floor drains, and scuppers; water and exit pipes and structural parts thereto being parts of sanitary installations; water filter devices and water filters; water-purification apparatus; sinks; discharge or settling sinks; sinks, namely, wash basins; water-closets and urinals; overflow protections, namely, tub overflows | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Water and discharge conduits for sanitary installations, namely, plastic conduits for plumbing use; plastic water and discharge conduits for plumbing use; rings of rubber for use as pipe connection seals, namely, extension rings for extension of floor drains and scuppers, clamping rings for clamping floor coverings to floor drains and scuppers, insert rings for mounting of waterseal inserts in floor drains and scuppers and mounting plates for floor drains and scuppers; non-metal seals for use in plumbing, namely, waterseals and waterseal inserts; sealing plugs made primarily from rubber, namely, mud plugs; plastic conduits for plumbing use, namely, wash chutes and gullies | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | Water and discharge conduits, namely, plastic conduits for drainage, non-metallic water and exit pipes and structural parts thereto; non-metallic construction materials, namely, drainage devices in the nature of overflow protections and oil guards; non-metal ventilating ducts, namely, air vents for drainage systems; plastic conduits for drainage, namely, wash chutes and gullies; non-metallic drains, namely, non-metal floor drains and scuppers | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic pipe clips and clamps, and non-metallic clips and clamps for water and discharge conduits as well as water and exit pipes for sanitary installations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Purus AB
- Other trademarks owned by Purus AB
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PURUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |