USPTO serial 77241225
MONOSOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONOSOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Merrillville, IN
Merrillville, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
GREGORY J. CHINLUND MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE6300 SEARS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polyvinyl alcohol liquid solution used for dust abatement on soil, soil stabilization, and for yard waste stabilization and disposal; water soluble edible polymer films for use in the manufacture of delivery agents for flavoring and coloring for drinks and flavoring and seasoning for food | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Polyvinyl alcohol liquid solution for use as a dust absorbing composition on landing surfaces for aircraft, and for use as a dust binding composition in mining | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Containers for medical waste in the nature of water soluble plastic bags used to hold items contaminated with medical waste; medical bags made of water soluble film, sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Water soluble films, namely, water soluble plastic films for use in manufacturing of water soluble bags for household and agricultural use, namely, for use in packaging for detergents and agrichemicals, and for general industrial use; plastic material in the form of film for use in manufacturing; and plastic material in extruded form for use in production; polyvinyl alcohol water soluble film for use as a backing or topping to support embroidery on textiles and apparel; water soluble films, namely, water soluble plastic films for use as a support for embroidery or sewing on textiles and apparel, and as a backing for embroidery or sewing on textiles and apparel | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Containers made from water soluble plastic film, namely, water soluble packaging for detergents, water soluble packaging for agrichemicals, water soluble packaging for industrial and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of water soluble films made of plastic or polyvinyl alcohol, to order and/or specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MonoSol LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MonoSol LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MONOSOL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |