USPTO serial 77244466
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
ALBUQUERQUE, NM
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret C. McHugh
Margaret C. McHugh TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | computer dating and introduction services; Internet based social networking, introduction and dating services, namely, providing an online database of personal ads to facilitate on-line dating and introductions and information regarding on-line personals, social introduction and social networking activities and services, providing information in the field of dating and introduction services, and certifying particular characteristics and qualifications of individuals for purposes of dating, introduction, and social networking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |