USPTO serial 77253045
ORMUSIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3658702Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2009
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORMUSIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hallandale Beach, FL
Hallandale Beach, FL
Hallandale Beach, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty creams for body care; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Skin care preparations, namely, fruit acid peels for skin; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin clarifiers; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin conditioners; Skin cream; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin creams in liquid and solid; Skin emollients; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Skin lighteners; Skin lightening creams; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Skin masks; Skin moisturizer; Skin moisturizer masks; Skin polishing rice bran (arai-nuka); Skin soap; Skin texturizers; Skin toners; Skin whitening creams; Skin whitening preparations; Soaps for body care; Sun care lotions; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Wrinkle removing skin care preparations; Antibacterial skin soaps; Lotions for skin and hair; Mousse for hair; Nail care preparations; Nail care preparations, namely, nail softeners; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Oil baths for hair care; Patches containing sun screen and sun block for use on the skin; Skin abrasive preparations; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin bronzer; Skin bronzing creams; Skin care preparation, namely, body polish; Skin care preparations, namely, chemical peels for skin; Deodorants for body care | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |