USPTO serial 77256022
NETSECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETSECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
QUATRRO BPO SOLUTIONS (P) Ltd.
GURGAON, HARYANA 12201, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. DE LUCA
JOHN P. DE LUCA JOHN P. DELUCA, ATTORNEY17420 RYEFIELD CTDICKERSON, MD 20842-8807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CREDIT CARD SECURITY AND CREDIT CARD FRAUD PREVENTION CONSULTATION, NAMELY PROVIDING CREDIT CARD SECURITY IN REAL TIME IN CONNECTION WITH ON-LINE AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS TO PREVENT FRAUDULENT USE OF CREDIT CARDS, FRAUD MANAGEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH CARD NOT PRESENT (CNP) TRANSACTIONS, TRANSACTION MONITORING AND SCORING, MONITORING AND ALERTING SUSPECT CNP FRAUDULENT TRANSACTIONS, GENERATING BUSINESS INTELLEGENCE, EDUCATION AND TRAINING ON CNP TRENDS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |