USPTO serial 77256284
SIMMILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2010
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with SIMMILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
Mossingen, DE
SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
Mossingen, DE
SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
Mossingen, DE
Mossingen, DD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines, namely, cutting machines, boring machines, drilling machines, pneumatic hammers, industrial machine presses, polishing machines for polishing wood, ceramics, rice and barley; saws, namely, chain saws, table saws, jig saws, and circular saws, * excluding single-piece saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, or saw bands; * ] [ machine tools, namely, metalworking machine tools, ] tool bits for machines, extension bars for power tools, namely, for power and electrical drills, routers; [ power-operated machine tools, namely, milling cutters, ] [ power operated nailing guns, chucks for power drills, ratchet wrenches, screwdrivers, power operated reel for garden hose, shredders for industrial use, power saw blades, * excluding single-piece saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, or saw bands; * blades for power saws, * excluding single-piece saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, or saw bands; * polishers, spray guns for spraying paint, ] [ drill bits; ] metal-cutting tools and metal-removing tools, namely, cutting blades as part of machines, [ cutting dies for use in cutting boxes for the packaging industry, cutting dies as part of machine, ] power-operated chisels, power drills, milling cutters, countersinking cutters [, electric planes, power operated files, grinders, saws for such machines and tool machines, * excluding single-piece saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, or saw bands * ] [ ; power-operated machine tools for machining metal, wood or plastics, namely, metal working machines ] [, injection plastic molding machines, and electric scissors; ] and holders and receptacles for use with the aforementioned tools [ and machines ] | ACTIVE | Apr 8, 2010 |
| 008 | [ Manually operated tools and devices for metal-cutting and non-cutting tools, namely, cutting blades, cutting dies, chisels, drills, milling cutters, countersinking cutters, planes, files, grinders, saws for machining metal, wood or plastics, * excluding single-piece saw blades, reciprocating saw blades, or saw bands; * and holders and receptacles for use with the aforementioned tools ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 8, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTEK Prazisionswerkzeuge GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SIMTEK AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named SIMMILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 23, 2015 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2015 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |