USPTO serial 77257902
MPRIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPRIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J DISKIN
MARK J DISKIN COPILEVITZ & CANTER, LLC1900 L STREET, N.W.SUITE 215WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF MAGAZINES IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-AGING MEDICINE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis; Compiling data for research purposes in the field of medical science and medical consultancy; Information on the subject of scientific research in the field of biochemistry and biotechnology; Laboratory research in the field of biology; Medical and scientific research in the field of anti-aging; Medical and scientific research information in the field of anti-aging; Medical research; Scientific and technical consulting and research services relating to foods and dietary supplements; Scientific research; Scientific research and development; Scientific research in the field of genetics and genetic engineering | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |