USPTO serial 77262086
SWEET HEDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3974840Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWEET HEDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coral Gables, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Coral Gables, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Schwartz, Esquire
ELIZABETH F. SCHWARTZ, ESQUIRE ELIZABETH F. SCHWARTZ, P.A.560 LINCOLN RD STE 400MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery desserts; Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bakery products, namely, sweet bakery goods; Mixes for bakery goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |