USPTO serial 77268439
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary A. Donovan
MARY A. DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012-3838UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food blenders, electric mixers, electric food processors and electric juicers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Refrigerators, range hoods, free standing cooking ranges, gas stoves, electric stoves, electric cooking ovens, gas cooking ovens, wall ovens, microwave ovens, kitchen cook tops, electric coffee makers, electric coffee percolators, electric espresso machines, buffet servers, electric grills, barbecue grills, pizza grills, stove top grills, deep fat fryers, electric deep fryers, gas deep fat fryers, ice making machines, electric food steamers, electric slow cookers, electric rice cookers, appliances for domestic use, namely, temperature controlled wine cellars, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens and water purifying apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |