Drawing for COMMERCIAL CHEF

USPTO serial 77269249

COMMERCIAL CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMERCIAL CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Donovan

Mary A. Donovan Donovan & Yee LLP161 Avenue of the AmericasSuite 1201New York, NY 10013

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen machines, namely, electric food blenders, electric hand mixers, electric standing mixers, electric food processors and electric juicersACTIVE
011Refrigerators, range hoods, free standing cooking ranges, gas stoves, electric stoves, electric cooking ovens, gas cooking ovens, electric cooking wall ovens, gas cooking wall ovens, microwave ovens, kitchen cook tops, electric coffee makers, electric coffee percolators, electric espresso machines, buffet servers, electric grills, barbecue grills, pizza grills, stove top grills, deep fat fryers, electric deep fryers, gas deep fat fryers, ice making machines, electric food steamers, electric slow cookers, electric rice cookers, appliances for domestic use, namely, temperature controlled wine cellars, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens and water purifying apparatusACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 5, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 5, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Sep 21, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Mar 27, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 19, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 6, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 21, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 21, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 20, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 27, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance