Drawing for HYDROPOOL SECOND NATURE PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 77269463

HYDROPOOL SECOND NATURE PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HYDROPOOL SECOND NATURE PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lorelei G. Graham

Lorelei G. Graham Miller Thomson LLPSuite 301 Ontario AgriCentre100 Stone Road WestGuelph, N1G 5L3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hot tubs, spas in the nature of heated pools, whirlpool baths, spas in the nature of heated pools that allows the swimmer to swim in place against an adjustable current, saunas; swimming pool water cleaning and filtering unitsABANDONEDJul 1, 2005
019Gazebos not primarily of metalABANDONEDJul 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 17, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 17, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 17, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Apr 8, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 2, 2009OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 17, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 9, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance