Drawing for COMFORTFIT

USPTO serial 77272155

COMFORTFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORTFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.

MICHAEL D. HOBBS, JR. TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA - SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf gloves; baseball and softball gloves; baseball and softball batting glovesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 1, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 1, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 1, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 5, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 9, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 9, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Sep 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance