Drawing for COMFORTFIT

USPTO serial 77272155

COMFORTFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORTFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.

MICHAEL D. HOBBS, JR. TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA - SUITE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf gloves; baseball and softball gloves; baseball and softball batting glovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 1, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 1, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 5, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance