USPTO serial 77274269
MONTE CARLO MARINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONTE CARLO MARINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | (Based on 44(e)) Yachts, boats(Based on Intent to Use) structural parts therefor; Boat accessories, namely, canvas covers, enclosures and windows sold as a unit and affixed to the boat for recreational boating and marine use | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on 44(e)) Clothing, namely, coats, mantles, raincoats, dusters, fur coats, dresses, suits, skirts, jackets, trousers, shorts sets, Bermuda shorts, jeans, waistcoats, shirts, t-shirts, tops, blouses, jerseys, sweaters, blazers, cardigans, stockings, socks, underwear, corsets, brassieres, underpants, night-gowns, shifts, pajamas, bathrobes, bathing suits, beach-wraps, sun suits in the nature of bathing suits, wet suits for water skiing, sport jackets, waterproof clothing in the nature of waterproof jackets and pants; wind-resistant jackets, anoraks, sweat suits, ties, neckties, scarves, shawls, mufflers, foulards, caps, hats, hoods, gloves, sashes, belts; footwear, beach footwear, athletic footwear, boots, shoes, and slippers; Clothing, namely, knitwear in the nature of knit shirts, knitted caps, and knitted underwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Arranging of events, namely, arranging and conducting marketing promotional events for others in the field of yacht and boat races; business management of teams competing in competitions in the field of yacht and boat races | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) Sporting entertainment services in the nature of yacht and boat races; educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, conferences, workshops in the field of yachts, boats, and yacht and boat races; providing information in the field of yacht and boat racing via the Internet; providing an on-line computer database in the field of yacht and boat racing; providing safe driving and sports driving courses; arranging sporting events, namely, arranging and conducting sporting events in the field of yacht and boat races; (Based on Intent to Use) publishing of books, magazines, electronic publications, web magazines; production of television shows, films, and plays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fulvio Maria BALLABIO
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MONTE CARLO MARINE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |