USPTO serial 77274889
QUINN & SHERRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUINN & SHERRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game joysticks; Computer game programs; Electronic game software for wireless devices; Interactive video game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action figures and accessories therefor; Action skill games; Dolls and accessories therefor; Electronic action toys; Electronic learning toys; Construction toys; Electronic toy vehicles; Equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; Hand puppets; Infant toys; Inflatable toys; Jigsaw puzzles; Manipulative games; Marbles; Non-electronic toy vehicles; Party games; Pinball games; Promotional game cards; Promotional game materials; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Mechanical toys; Musical toys; Plastic character toys; Play figures; Play houses; Plush toys; Pull toys; Ride-on toys; Sketching toys; Talking toys; Toy bakeware and cookware; Toy building blocks; Toy figures; Toy robots; Toy rockets; Trading card games; Water squirting toys; Wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of a game show; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game; Production and distribution of television shows and movies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quinn & Sherry Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quinn & Sherry Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named QUINN & SHERRY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |