USPTO serial 77275699
IMRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3829977Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IMRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUXEMBOURG, LU
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnpeg, Manitoba, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging systems comprised of a magnetic resonance imaging magnet, tracks on which the magnetic resonance imaging magnet moves, and magnetic resonance imaging magnet controls; operating room tables, and structural parts therefor; head fixation frames to keep a patient's head fixed in position during surgery and magnetic resonance imaging scans; and computer software and electronic controls sold as a unit with the intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging systems that permit the integration and control of all equipment utilized in a surgical suite containing an intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of magnetic resonance imaging systems and operating room tables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | integration services in the nature of installation of computer software that allows magnetic resonance imaging systems to be integrated into surgical suites with all other equipment that may be installed and/or used in a surgical suite | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEERFIELD IMAGING, S.À R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IMRIS Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMRIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |