CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for MAXIMUM ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (MEN)

USPTO serial 77275859

MAXIMUM ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (MEN)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIMUM ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (MEN)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Cable television programming; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 22, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 10, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance