USPTO serial 77276229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Radio broadcasting | ABANDONED | Mar 17, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2015 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |