USPTO serial 77278012
TRUTAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUTAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts; footwear; headgear, namely, caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, computer software and systems for the sending and receiving text, image, video and audio messages, with telephones, personal digital assistants, personal computers and remote access terminals; communications services, namely, one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one and many-to-many synchronous and asynchronous messaging; contact, relationship, associate and address book management; electronic communication services, namely, data delivery and retrieval to and from remote Internet and computer services, data synchronization between computer services and telecommunication devices; social communication services via a telecommunications device, namely, contact management, profile, presence and status publication, searching and retrieval, relationship matching and dating services, location-based discovery and communication; telecommunication of information including web pages, computer programs, messages, sound and images and any other data, namely, coupons, games, polls, subscriptions, location, relationships; electronic message sending, receiving and forwarding services; web-casting services; electronic mail services; video mail services; voicemail services; providing user access telecommunication infrastructure in order for users to access databases, Internet and online communication services; providing telecommunications connections; electronic data transmission; electronic transmissions of messages, sound and images; voice, data and video conferencing; transmission, broadcast, reception of sound, data or images by computer, cable, electronic mail, television or satellite means; information , advisory and consultancy services relating to the technical aspects of all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic storage of electric media in the form of sound, data or images which have been transmitted by computer, cable, electronic mail, television or satellite means | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRUTAP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Hotxt Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TRUTAP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |