USPTO serial 77278992
LILO MOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LILO MOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless telephony, telecommunications software downloadable through the internet onto a cellular phone enabling a person to make long-distance calls | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Prepaid telephone calling cards not magnetically coded | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online store services featuring pre-paid calling cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; wireless telephone telecommunication services, namely, wireless mobile telephone calling plans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buzz Telecommunications Services Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LILO MOBILE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |