USPTO serial 77279555
Serial No. 77279555
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 77279555?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware, namely, keyboards; computer hardware for keyboards that make it easier to operate the computer, namely, a computer pointing device that is in the form of a two joysticks attached to the keyboard near the space bar and is operated with the thumb so the fingers do not have to move from the region of the keys; laptop computers; computer hardware for laptop keyboards that make it easier to operate the laptop, namely, a computer pointing device that is in the form of a two joysticks attached to the laptop keyboard near the space bar and is operated with the thumb so the fingers do not have to move from the region of the keys; computer software for use in programming a computer to accept an attachment device for keyboards that makes it easier to operate the computer; computer software for programming a laptop to accept an attachment device for laptops that makes it easier to operate the laptop; eye glasses, sports glasses and sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |