Drawing for GAMEPLEX

USPTO serial 77281031

GAMEPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMEPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing intellectual property theater screening facilities, namely, providing theater facilities for screening movies, playing video games on the movie screens, watching broadcast and cable television on the movie screens, watching audio and video broadcasts from a global computer network on the movie screens, watching sporting events on the movie screens, watching concert events on a global computer network on the movie screens, watching educational broadcasts on the movie screens, and listening to music and audible book readings in the theatersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jun 1, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 17, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 17, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 17, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 12, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 12, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Sep 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance