USPTO serial 77281575
INHIBITOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INHIBITOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Brown
Michael J. Brown Michael J. Brown Law Office570 West Mt. Pleasant AvenueSuite 101Livingston, NJ 07039Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, facial makeup, eye makeup and foundation makeup, cosmetic pencils, rouge, skin and beauty masks, foundations, concealers, blusher, eye shadows, eye liners, eye pencils, mascara, makeup removers, eye makeup removers, lipsticks, lip plumpers, non-medicated lip balm, lip pencils, lip gloss, cosmetic lip creams, non-medicated lip conditioner, non-medicated lip moisturizer, non-medicated lip gels, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, aftershave, incense, sachets, antiperspirants, personal deodorants, soap, deodorant soap, hair bleaching preparations, saddle soap, skin soaps, toilet soap, liquid soap, shampoo, conditioners, baby shampoo, bubble bath, bath gel, shower gel, hair dyes, hair gel, hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair, hair care preparations, hair relaxing preparations, hair rinses, hair spray, nail enamel, nail enamel remover, nail strengthener, cuticle removing preparations, nail care preparations, nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, body lotion, hand cream, bust cream, eye cream, hair removing creams, night creams, skin cleansing creams and lotions, skin creams, cold creams, facial scrubs, skin clarifiers, skin emollients, skin lighteners, skin lotions, vanishing creams, depilatory creams, skin moisturizers, wrinkle removing creams, facial moisturizers, non-medicated foot powder, baby talcum powder, baby powder, body powder, face powder, bath powder, talcum powder, facial cleaners, astringents for cosmetic purpose, skin toner, after sun gel, sunblock preparations, sunscreen preparations, sun tanning preparations, baby oil, body oil, essential oils for personal use, massage oil, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, pre-moistened cosmetic tissues, cosmetic towelettes, pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, cosmetic cotton for cosmetic purposes, cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes, cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, toothpaste, tooth gel, tooth powder, non-medicated mouthwash, non-medicated mouth rinse, breath fresheners, dental bleaching gel and paste, denture cleaning preparations, shaving balm, shaving gel, shaving lotion | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |