USPTO serial 77282355
THE HIGHEST QUALITY IS THE BOTTOM LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HIGHEST QUALITY IS THE BOTTOM LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Procurement, namely, purchasing a wide variety of medical supplies, office supplies, pharmaceuticals and healthcare products for others; Hospital management consulting services in the field of health care cost containment, supply chain management, health care operational productivity and healthcare supply pricing; Providing an online computer database featuring business management information for analyzing and assessing health care cost containment, health care quality and safety, accounting, labor assessment, operational productivity data, health care contract optimization, price verification, price benchmarking, pricing and overhead cost reduction, spending patterns, purchasing optimization, and supply chain information management; Hospital management information services, namely, acquiring, analyzing, and furnishing business information relating to productivity, profitability and cost accounting data relating to the field of hospital management and business operations of health care facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial management and administration of risk retention groups for healthcare professional liability; financial consultation services, namely, providing financial analysis relating to profitability and cost accounting data in the field of hospital management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer programs that record, analyze and assess data for the purpose of health care cost containment, quality and safety improvement, accounting, labor assessment, operational productivity data, health care contract optimization, price verification, price benchmarking, pricing and overhead cost reduction, spending patterns, purchasing optimization, and supply chain information management specifically designed for the health care industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consulting services in the field of healthcare informatics; providing an on-line computer database in the fields of health care informatics and clinical and operational comparative patient, syndrome, health systems performance, and patient satisfaction data; medical information services, namely, acquiring, analyzing and furnishing clinical data for medical counseling purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Premier, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Premier, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THE HIGHEST QUALITY IS THE BOTTOM LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |