USPTO serial 77282500
MPAY EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MPAY EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the services of mobile commerce and payment solutions, cashless electronic payment software and cashless electronic payment services through the administration of consumer loyalty incentive award programs for others; sales promotions services relating to mobile commerce and payment solutions, cashless electronic payment software and cashless electronic payment services through the administration of consumer loyalty incentive award programs; administration, billing and reconciliation of accounts on behalf of others for the purpose of promoting the purchase of mobile content in real-time without the use of a credit card | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Credit card processing services; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at point of sale that allows consumers to purchase mobile content in real-time without the use of a credit card, and peer-to-peer P2P money remittance services; real-time mobile debit payment processing services, namely, providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer; electronic commerce payment services enabling consumers to make payments for goods and services purchased from merchants, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services via telephone, via digital communication devices, via the Internet and via television; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; cashless fund-transfer services for merchants and consumers whereby purchase monies are held in trust and sent to merchants upon sales to consumers; financial processing services and monetary check processing services, namely, providing payment to merchants who sell to consumers services and goods online; financial clearinghouse services, namely, clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; providing a wide variety of payment services, namely, credit card and debit card services, processing and transmission of bills and payments thereof, conducted via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2007 |
| 038 | Electronic services, namely, electronic data transmission for consumers and merchants to send and receive payments via telephone, via digital communication devices, via the Internet and via television; mobile media services, namely, electronic transmission of entertainment media content in the nature of ring tones, graphics, text, downloadable computer games, data and music via a global computer network and mobile telephones, digital players and wireless devices; communication and telecommunication services, namely, providing multi-user access to telecommunications networks, computer networks, wireless networks and satellite networks; wireless digital messaging services; transmitting and receiving sound, voices, video, images, text, documents, data and information via computer terminals, communication networks and wireless devices; providing multi-user access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections and wireless access to global and private computer networks for the exchange of text messaging and information and to send and receive electronic mail; paging services; providing transmission services, namely, streaming audio and video material on the Internet | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2007 |
| 039 | On-line computer services for storing sound, voices, video, images, text, documents, data and information selected by users via computer terminals, communication networks and wireless devices; electronic storage of information in the nature of files and documents; traffic information services provided by telephone, cellular telephone, radio, computer, over a global computer network | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2007 |
| 041 | Editing of sound, voices, video, images, text, documents, data and information via computer terminals, communication networks and wireless devices | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paycasso Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MPAY EXPRESS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |