USPTO serial 77282632
YUMMY MOMMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YUMMY MOMMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCEPT BEER; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES EXCEPT BEER, IN THE NATURE OF SHOTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |