Drawing for THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG

USPTO serial 77291587

THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Rupp

BRIAN RUPP THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 SOUTH BUENA VISTA STREETCORPORATE LEGAL - TRADEMARK DEPT.BURBANK, CA 91521

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio cassette recorders; audio cassette players; audio speakers; binoculars; calculators; camcorders; pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring music, stories, games, and activities in the nature of entertainment for children; computer hardware, namely, CD-ROM drives, CD-ROM writers, and computer modems; cellular telephones; cellular telephone accessories, namely, headphones, head sets comprised of microphones and audio receivers, electricity adapters and batteries for cellular telephones; cellular telephone cases; face plates for cellular telephones; compact disc players; compact disc recorders; computers; computer hardware; computer keyboards; computer monitors; computer mouse; computer disc drives; computer software featuring learning activities for children; cordless telephones; decorative magnets; pre-recorded DVDs and digital video discs, all featuring music, animated entertainment, and stories; DVD players; DVD recorders; electronic personal organizers; eyeglass cases; eyeglasses; headphones; karaoke machines; microphones; MP3 players; mouse pads; motion picture films featuring animated entertainment and stories; pagers; personal stereos; personal digital assistants; printers; radios; sunglasses; telephones; television sets; video cameras; video cassette recorders; video cassette players; video cassettes; videophones; walkie-talkies; wrist and arm rests for use with computersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 1, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 1, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2009CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 26, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jul 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance