USPTO serial 77294807
SMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biometric readers, such as fingerprint scanner devices; security devices, namely electronic door controllers; cards in this class, namely contactless proximity smartcards being cards carrying magnetically, optically, electronically, recorded or encoded information, contactless proximity smartcards printed with security features for authentication purposes, and contactless proximity smartcards printed with security features for identification purposes; devices carrying data; security apparatus, namely elevator controllers, door controllers, alarm systems; computer software; computer software for access control and/or closed circuit television (CCTV) management and configuration; closed circuit video apparatus, namely analog and IP cameras, video encoders, and video capture cards for use in access control; closed circuit television monitoring apparatus; electrical security devices, other than for vehicles, namely Linux Web Server; card readers, including smart card readers, smartcard reader with PIN pad, readers for encoded cards; security devices for doors of buildings (electric locking devices); security systems comprising access control panel for buildings in this class; security systems comprising elevator controllers and expansion devices for elevators | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Cards in this class, namely non-magnetic cards for encoding non-magnetic cards printed with security features for authentication purposes; non-magnetic cards printed with security features for identification purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of online non-downloadable web-based software for the management and configuration of an access control and/or closed circuit television (CCTV) system | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services; monitoring of security systems; monitoring of surveillance systems, namely the remote monitoring of access control and closed circuit television (CCTV) installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BQT Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SMAX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |