USPTO serial 77299213
SMARTIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen E. McCarthy
Kathleen E. McCarthy King & Spalding LLP1185 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electro-mechanical components, namely, electric pumps, electric micropumps, conveyors, microconveyers, electric generators, electric microgenerators, electric motors for machines, machine parts, namely, bearings, and vibration dampers, sold to biomedical companies for use in biomedical devices, namely, implantable drug delivery systems, fluid conveying systems, cardiovascular and vascular flow control systems, and diagnostic fluid condition monitoring systems for permanent or disposable use; electro-mechanical components, namely, electric fluid pumps, conveyors, electric motors for machines, and machine parts, namely, bearings, sold to biomedical companies for use in manufacturing biomedical devices; electro-mechanical components, namely, electric pumps, electric micropumps, conveyors, microconveyors, electric generators, electric microgenerators, flow circulators, electric motors, bearings, and dampers, sold as an integral part of propulsion devices, namely, motor servo-drive and bearing systems in the nature of bearings for machines, all for ground, above-ground or underwater use; electro-mechanical components, namely, electric pumps, electric micropumps, conveyors, microconveyors, electric generators, electric microgenerators, electric motors, machine parts, namely, bearings, and vibration dampers for machines, sold to aerospace companies for use in aerospace devices, namely, onboard vehicle hydraulic flow control systems, fluid conveying systems, electrical power generation systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; electro-mechanical components, namely, electric pumps, electric micropumps, conveyors, microconveyors, electric generators, electric microgenerators, electric motors, machine parts, namely, bearings, and vibration dampers for machines, sold to manufacturers for use in industrial devices, namely, electrical power generation systems, industrial flow control systems, fluid and solid particulates conveying systems, blending and compounding systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, chemical reactor and bioreactor systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; electro-mechanical components, namely, electric pumps, electric micropumps, conveyors, microconveyors, electric generators, electric microgenerators, electric motors, machine parts, namely, bearings, and vibration dampers for machines, sold to automotive companies for use in automotive devices, namely, onboard vehicle hydraulic flow control systems, fluid conveying systems, electrical power generation systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; and excluding office supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electro-mechanical components, namely, circulators in the nature of flow circulators and electronic sensors for fluid control monitoring, sold to biomedical companies for use in biomedical devices, namely, implantable drug delivery systems, fluid conveying systems, cardiovascular and vascular flow control systems, and diagnostic fluid condition monitoring systems for permanent or disposable use; and circulators sold to biomedical companies for use in manufacturing biomedical devices; circulators in the nature of flow circulators, sold to aerospace companies for use in aerospace devices, namely, onboard vehicle hydraulic flow control systems, fluid conveying systems, electrical power generation systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; circulators in the nature of flow circulators, sold to manufacturers for use in industrial devices, namely, electrical power generation systems, industrial flow control systems, fluid and solid particulates conveying systems, blending and compounding systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, chemical reactor and bioreactor systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; circulators in the nature of flow circulators sold to automotive companies for use in automotive devices, namely, onboard vehicle hydraulic flow control systems, fluid conveying systems, electrical power generation systems, fluid condition monitoring systems, and motor drive, bearing and physical damping systems; and excluding office supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTIN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Smartin Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Smartin Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |