Drawing for TESTCREEK

USPTO serial 77299707

TESTCREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TESTCREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Peter Hochberg

D. PETER HOCHBERG D. PETER HOCHBERG CO., L.P.A.1940 E 6TH ST FL 6CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, namely, computer software used for testing software and for collecting, recording, managing, monitoring, and reporting on software testing and software development activity and resultsACTIVE
039Electronic storage of dataACTIVE
042Services, namely, the implementation of testing software, computer software testing data analysis and research; computer services, namely, providing reports and distributing test data in the field of computer software testing; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice in the field of software testing and troubleshooting of testing data and results via telephone, email and over global computer networks; providing information and consulting in the field of software testingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 27, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 27, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 13, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance