USPTO serial 77300170
RAPID REFILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3604951Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 14, 2009
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAPID REFILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jodi A. DeSchane
JODI A. DESCHANE Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.P.O. Box 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PRINTER INK CARTRIDGES AND TONER CARTRIDGES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING NEW AND RECYCLED OR REMANUFACTURED PRINTER CARTRIDGES AND TONER CARTRIDGES, PAPER, BLANK DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIA, AND SUPPLIES FOR PRINTERS, FAX MACHINES AND COPIERS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 037 | RECONDITIONING AND REFILLING OF PRINTER CARTRIDGES AND TONER CARTRIDGES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
| 040 | RECYCLING OF PRINTER CARTRIDGES AND TONER CARTRIDGES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAPID REFILL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Rapid Refill Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Rapid Refill Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Rapid Refill Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named RAPID REFILL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2015 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |