USPTO serial 77301019
QUEEN ELIZABETH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2011
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with QUEEN ELIZABETH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Smith
Jeffrey Smith MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel and tour arrangement services; making reservations and bookings for transportation; organization of excursions, sightseeing tours, holidays, tours and travel | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 2011 |
| 043 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for temporary accommodations | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 25, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |