USPTO serial 77302282
GET CHARGED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GET CHARGED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren B.Cohen
DARREN B.COHEN REED SMITH LLP599 LEXINGTON AVE FL 28NEW YORK, NY 10022-7684UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software component integrated into the heel of the blade holder connected to a resistor which heats the blade of an ice skate, electronic devices, namely, devices used to reduce the friction of the blade gliding on the ice for use in the field of ice skating; video recordings on the subject of ice skating training; and batteries used with skates and customized battery-chargers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Booklets on the subject of ice skating | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sport equipment, namely, ice skates and parts and accessories thereof, namely, skate blades, skate guards, skate blade protective sleeves; replacement skate parts, namely, rivets, blades, plastic skate holders, skate books, laces, screws, promotional items, namely, hockey pucks, golf tees and other sporting accessories, namely, golf bags, golf head covers, nylon pouches, sports bags, backpacks, belt bags, wristbands, water bottles and hockey sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |