USPTO serial 77304556
BLUE QUENCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4198690Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2012
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE QUENCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Simsbury, CT
West Simsbury, CT
West Simsbury, CT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Thermoelectric cooler/heater for food and beverages; Water coolers; Electric refrigerators; Ice-cooling refrigerators; Refrigerated beverage dispensing units; Refrigerated dispensing units for beverages | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2017 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 15, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |