Drawing for 99 BOTTLES OF TEARS ON THE WALL

USPTO serial 77309146

99 BOTTLES OF TEARS ON THE WALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 99 BOTTLES OF TEARS ON THE WALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginie Parant

VIRGINIE PARANT ARTIST LAW GROUP3500 W OLIVE AVE STE 300BURBANK, CA 91505-4647UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Accessories, namely, metal key chainsACTIVE
012Car accessories, namely, visors, license-plate holders and hood ornamentsACTIVE
016posters, calendars, note pads, paper coastersACTIVE
020accessories, namely, non-metal and non-leather key chains; and car accessories, namely, hanging ornaments of plasticACTIVE
021Mugs, pitchers; leather and plastic coasters; coasters not of paper and not being table linen; drinking glasses; shot glasses; wine glassesACTIVE
025clothing and apparel, namely, shirts, shorts, skirts, pants, tank tops, underwear, lingerie, belts, socks, hatsACTIVE
028trivia gamesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 31, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 29, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance