Drawing for LUCKY DOLLAR

USPTO serial 77310880

LUCKY DOLLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCKY DOLLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara H. Loewenthal

BARBARA H. LOEWENTHAL GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and wholesale store services, electronic catalog services, mail order catalog services, toll free telephone order-taking services for others, and computerized online ordering via global computer network, all featuring electronics, household electronic appliances and products, video equipment, audio equipment, personal computers and other home and office products and furniture, telephones, phone answering devices; promoting the goods and services of others by placing and displaying advertisementsACTIVE
036Providing financial services, namely, providing a virtual currency for use by members of an online community via a global computer network; providing information in the fields of foreign currency, commodities, financial derivatives, interest rate products, and equities via the Internet and intranet systems; electronic commerce services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; credit services, namely, credit consultation services; credit reporting services; financial services in the field of money lending; commercial lending services; consumer lending and mortgage lending; bill payment services; collection of debts; debt collection agenciesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 8, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Oct 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance